In The Billionaire's Housekeeper Mistress the billionaire and housekeeper elements of the title had been established within the first three chapters. For the more enticing mistress development, however, one had to read on and those who did decide to continue after the disappointment of the first three chapters would have found a lot more than merely the classic housekeeper becoming mistress to billionaire routine. There was a world of intrigue and character-development hidden beneath that idiotic title and incorrect blurb. But how can an author stretch a character being belligerently dumb for twelve chapters without inducing despair and book-destroying rage in their reader? In the case of Emma Darcy, author of The Billionaire's Housekeeper Mistress, the answer is she couldn't.
Daisy Donohue was fired from her job as personal assistant to some mean-spirited dame thanks to the abhorrent behaviour of ruthless billionaire Ethan Cartwright. Shrill exasperated cry! If Daisy wasn't angry and infatuated enough with him already! As an apology for losing her the job Ethan offers her new work under him as supervisor of his plush mansion's renovation. Daisy needs money to pay off her parents' debts and is grateful for the newfound employment. However, a troubling downside to working with Ethan Cartwright is the effect he has on her. He's gorgeous, kind, a good cook and a lover of board games. He also enjoys walking around in revealing robes and smelling nice.
For the destitute Daisy he is everything she wants in a man, but how can a poor wretch such as her be the dream woman for a hunk of manly loveliness like Ethan? She cannot, she constantly reminds herself despite all evidence to the contrary. Therefore she must bury her desire deep, along with her heart and logic. Ethan, on the other hand, cannot take his eyes from Daisy. She is perfect. She's sexy, but without knowing it, and feisty, fun, smart and emotionally-retarded, although she seems aware of these. If only Ethan can prove that he wants to have sex with her. Perhaps he can tell her, straightforward and matter of fact, shortly after having sex with her?
He does, but Daisy is too enamoured by Ethan and the sex to listen properly and runs away, fearing that their obvious physical connection and declarations of love might ruin any chances they have for a relationship. Fearing losing her to a bottomless pit of stupidity, Ethan lays his cards on the table and delivers a crushing ultimatum. He offers to help Daisy's family with their financial troubles, but in exchange she must consent to become his lover. To Daisy it's akin to prostitution, but fortunately her family is desperate for the income and she is in love with Ethan and is desperate to keep him in her life for sex and companionship. What a dilemma! Thankfully for the novel she agrees to Ethan's demands. Everyone wins and absolutely no drama is guaranteed.
Ethan Cartwright's ruthless billionaire ruthlessly exploits Daisy as they wait to see if his stock market genius will have the desired effect on the Donohue portfolio. With the work on his home completed he wrangles Daisy a new job in PR, because there's only a letter between PA and PR so how different can those careers be? Fortunately nothing, as it turns out Daisy can do whatever she puts her mind to, besides accepting reality, and she takes to her new job like a Mills & Boon reader takes to alcohol.
Ethan solves the debt by investing the Donohue's money (First the reader had heard of them having any money, by the way. If they had money to invest how come they were facing bankruptcy. Oh, you know what, when you consider the plot up until this point the sudden appearance of family funds is a minor contrivance) in a small company about to hit it big (Still, though. Daisy mentions her parent's business portfolio so we can assume there was money there and Ethan merely reinvests this money in better companies, but didn't stocks plummet leaving no money at all? Does that seem odd to anyone else? Is this what happens when you stop reading newspapers? You start to become confused by Harlequin stories? Oh, you know what, it probably isn't important in the grand scheme of things. Daisy questions everything and look where that gets her, a life of luxury and adoration with her ideal man), solving all the family's financial problems and setting the parents up with a fortune.
Ethan's promise fulfilled he returns to Daisy ready to enjoy his personal winnings. Daisy is only too eager to oblige because she is in love with Ethan and he with her. If only their mutual happiness and strength of their emotional and physical bond could somehow be turned into mutual happiness and a strong emotional and physical bond. Ye gods, why do thee forsake Daisy so? She's done nothing to deserve this kind of mistreatment? Is she unable to enjoy more than she could have ever hoped to have even though she already has it because she's cursed by the gods or because she is emotionally-retarded? We shouldn't be surprised to learn that the titular housekeeper mistress of The Billionaire's Housekeeper Mistress is an easily manipulated moron, but you may be surprised to find out that Ethan only sees her emotional-retardation as adorable and does everything in his power to convince her he is in love with her, besides telling her the truth.
While it appears jarring to use blackmail in your bland romance novel Emma Darcy carefully sidesteps such issues by weakening the implication to the point of insignificance. The fear of upsetting the dreamy perfection of the hero means Darcy writes herself into a typical Mills & Boon cul-de-sac. Sure, it's a lovely cul-de-sac, the houses are huge and the people are white, and their kids play on the street in the sunshine and everyone is forever in love, but it's a cul-de-sac nonetheless. Ethan Cartwright may force Daisy to do something, but it's nothing sinister or against her wishes. Imagine if the movie Saw had the villain capturing people and making them eat as much chocolate cake as they want while screening The Princess Bride and giving them money? Yes, that is a film you could take your mother to, but it lacks the stakes and tension one needs to find stories compelling and worthwhile.
True credible love would be an unlikely result of blackmailing someone into bed, no matter how charming and handsome the blackmailer or foolhardy the victim. There is no hint of excitement in the plot and the central tension is non-existent. There aren't even contrived twists, despite Darcy's intention to contrive twists. 'She was all his... Until the telephone rang,' she writes, suggesting the new chapter will introduce an obstacle for the couple to overcome. The reader nervously turns the page, awaiting the stumbling block that will force the giddy couple apart for a few sentences. However, she throws nothing that Daisy and Ethan cannot dodge with their charm, good-looks and stupidity. The book becomes maddening even by Mills & Boon standards, and this is a publisher notorious for disliking any attempt, however fleeting, to disrupt the romance and tame descriptions of intercourse.
By the end of The Billionaire's Housekeeper Mistress, Ethan has finally proven to Daisy that he can be the man of her dreams and she has proven to herself she can be the wife of a billionaire. He proposes marriage and she is convinced that their relationship has a future and the whole scheme to buy her body was merely a charming proclamation of his infatuation and misogyny. He didn't just want to have sex and spend time with her for the foreseeable future, he really wanted marriage. One hundred and eighty-seven pages later and we can go back to sleep safe in the knowledge that this couple have overcome their comforts and will enjoy a lifetime of comfort. A happy ending where the happiness is a result of the story actually ending.
Modern Romance is an odd term for this subgenre. Perhaps the Mills & Boon decision-makers picked a word randomly from a hat. The name suggests this is the alternative to Historical in the same manner as Blaze! is the raunchy alternative to Tender. Throughout the history of romance fiction the books have always been modern, set in the time of their writing that is, yet still old-fashioned in their handling of character, theme and subject. With the steely blue cover comes cityscapes, suggesting the stories will deal with the rich, powerful and urban-dwelling, yet these are archetypes of the entire genre. The moniker ends up being no more than a heavy-handed attempt by the publishing house to claim their titles have joined everyone else in the twenty-first century and all the things people do in whatever year this is, but their authors consistently betray them.
Of The Billionaire's Housekeeper Mistress what part of the title implies today? Gorgeous ruthless billionaires gallivanting through the glamorous horse-racing season seems more out of touch than ever, if there was a time when such a thing could be considered contemporary. Modern is defined by its lack of flavour, the plain control, while the other subgenres deviate from the set-up with subtle changes to the period, location, worldliness and amount of explicit sexual content. So within Modern there is this peculiar ruthless billionaire beguiling virgin standard exploring the love that cannot exist between the two, but the love that grows through exploitation, wilful disobedience, enforced submission and marriage as punishment usually set to the backdrop of obscene abundance. Call Bewildered Heart old-fashioned but that doesn't sound like a world we live in or want to read anymore about.