The last time we heard from Lane Lincoln, his ex-wife, Cynthia James, and their precocious, obstinate daughter, Beth, they were planning a family Christmas together. Years of divorced parents had kept Beth from experiencing Christmas as the Pagans intended, celebrated together with every loved-one under a single roof in a room filled with clouds, wearing your finest smoking jacket and sipping non-alcoholic eggnog while a pheasant burns to death in the fireplace. Beth has never known a perfect Christmas and so her Dad has flown in from Hollywood to Oregon to visit his former in-laws and has, in turn, managed to fall back in love with the only woman he has ever loved and never stopped loving. Furthermore, Cynthia feels as if she and Lane have finally matured and grown reasonable enough to the point where reconciliation would make the greatest present of all. All that is left is a series of sickeningly twee portraits of domestic bliss and showcases of flaunting disposable income. This book is so nineteen-nineties.
Now you might have recognised, somewhat perceptively, that the only reason for the original divorce was the lack of an honest conversation. After all, if that were the case then Romantics Anonymous' central plot could surely be solved within three pages, a structural flaw we normally associate with modern Mills & Boon. Lauryn Chandler's book was written in 1993, a much simpler time. There are no ruthless billionaires demanding demure virgins relent to the most wicked of desires. No, Lane Lincoln is a devilishly attractive Hollywood big-shot who cares about his daughter and ex-wife above all else and wants nothing more than to remarry and live in Oregon with them. Cynthia, meanwhile, has problems that amount to her almost making for a compelling protagonist. Firstly, while her top priority remains herself, she also has a daughter to occasionally remember having had. Moreover, there's her boyfriend, Alan, the blissful wedded life of her sister, Gwen, the happy second marriage of her mother, Mother, and about a hundred other characters too meaningless and poorly-written to mention.
While much of this is immaterial, Cynthia's nagging emotional problems, stemming from a childhood rich in neuroses, seem to have hamstrung her to an adulthood of regret and bitter loneliness, despite all the characters who constantly bother her. When she was a mere kid she witnessed the final fight between her mother and father, Henry, who stormed out and was never heard from again. Naturally, she loved her father, but has never forgiven him for abandoning her. She grew into a young woman still tender from the hurt and unable to fully trust. This lack of belief in eternal love was only exacerbated by Lane running off to Hollywood without so much as a, 'I'm running off to Hollywood now, but once I establish myself as a famous screenwriter you can come and live with me in California because that is my plan and my leaving should not be misconstrued as an urge to live apart from my family, seek divorce and further damage you emotionally.'
Without such a note, or suitably-worded greeting card, Cynthia files for divorce and Lane, wrongly assuming his wife acts under her own free will and wants a divorce, signs the papers and officially ends the relationship. Romantics Anonymous picks up ten years later and then spends the majority of its storyline clumsily shoe-horning in this necessary exposition. Fortunately the time needed for flashbacks and interior monologues is found because nothing of importance takes place in the present. Lane and Cynthia soon find the groove within which they first fell in love and without any of the potentially interesting conflicts that might have made the story worthwhile. Furthermore, they have family, friends, colleagues and a daughter all pushing them along, making the rejoining of their union all the more inevitable, boring and anti-climatic.
Is there nothing to stand in their way? A farcical misunderstanding shortly after love-making? No? No love-making at all? Tsk! How about Alan, the potential husband-to-be, jilted and made a mockery of by Lane's unashamed flirting? No? He'll casually step aside like the spineless gentleman he appears to be? Tsk! How about the re-emergence of Henry, estranged Dad, back to put the proverbial cat among the proverbial pigeons with the cat representing dredged up memories and the pigeons perhaps representing a life in denial of those memories? No? He'll saunter back, easily make peace with everyone and be forgiven all for an even more sentimentally-saccharine finale? Tsk! What about Romantics Anonymous itself, the very institution Cynthia created to warn herself and others like her away from destructive romances built on idealistic notions of perfection? No? Apparently her entire philosophy is shattered with the return of her soul-mate, both under the illusion their future is suddenly solid, even though it is built upon the promises that neither could live up to the first time around? Not only that but Lane will make his grand gesture to win her heart at a Romantics Anonymous meeting, much like someone celebrating sobriety by bringing a case of champagne to A.A.? Tsk! indeed.
When the reader angrily throws the finished book at their cat they may wish to compare Romantics Anonymous to their own vague understanding of how story-telling should work. This, of course, is an mistake, because the novel, by Lauryn Chandler, should be only judged on its contextual merits. Within the perimeters of Mills & Boon Romance Romance, or Cherish as we have come to call it, the tale of Lane and Cynthia reuniting and all the other causes of their brief bouts of unhappiness inbetween the long periods of professional success, is a perfectly satisfactory entry to the genre. It is awkwardly contrived at times, the characters are simpering morons who never offer any reason for us, the reader, to warm to them and the displays of family affection are inane and unlikely enough to induce rage. For example, when Cynthia gets the sniffles, Beth and Lane throw an "I-Have-a-Cold-But-Would-Rather-Be-Out-Making-Snowmen-So-Somebody-Cheer-Me-Up Party" where they wrap toiletries in wrapping paper, eat graham crackers with frosting on and curl up on the bed to watch Miracle on 34th Street, Christmas in Connecticut and Swamp Thing. How utterly loathsome, the reader thinks, curled up in bed, crumbs everywhere.
After numerous episodes such as this we have tired of the whole rotten bunch of them and insist Cynthia hurry up and forgive her father and Lane for not finding her as adorable as she finds herself. Beth has a birthday and gets two puppies from her father. There is cake, showtunes, Mexican food, make-up, ice cream, root beer and the excess typical of the family, but once the fun is over Lane has jetted off to California, Beth is wherever she goes at night, and Cynthia is alone again with her happy memories and the bitterness they bring. Will Lane ever return, she asks herself. What did he mean when he said he would be back in a few days and once he got back they would get married? Why are men so obdurate and vague in their promises? Are there really three more chapters to go? Jeez. Sure enough though, Lane reappears just in time to stop Cynthia mentally combusting and drowning the state of Oregon in her madness. From that point on there are only the things that always happen in Harlequin stories left to read of, with a smattering of public indecency thrown in. Can Cynthia finally stop being so weird? What will happen to her novel, her philosophy and all those damaged people she seemed intent on helping? Hah! Who cares about that, right? She's married now. Maybe she'll have another kid. That's all women want anyway. The life lived and the commitments made before marriage are forgotten.
Even though Lauryn Chandler and the characters from her book show little respect for the idea of a support group for compulsive romantics that doesn't mean Bewildered Heart can't spend a little time examining the concept itself. Now, many addictive vices can be harmful, such as narcotics, chocolate, sex, exercise, but should we not throw love into the mix as well? After all, those who chase romance regardless of the solidity of the relationship on which it rests are doomed to a series of short flings, discarded once the passion and mystery have dissipated. They chase fleeting moments of exhilaration in a life of dull minutiae. There is more to love than romance, Cynthia might once have argued, and while magic is like caviar, sometimes one needs whatever meat and potatoes represents to keep them regular. However, in the case of this book a compulsive romantic is not someone compulsively seeking romance, but rather someone constantly wishing to create it, and such an endeavour should not be queried and it should not be stopped, unless fatigue sets in. What's wrong with romance? We spend our lives awaiting the warmth and preeminence it offers, but accept the best things in life are transient and the honeymoon stage of a relationship is naturally short-lived.
Therefore Mills & Boon, Hollywood, and at least one of your friends, is happy to trade on this tragic rationalisation for their advantage. We read book after book, and watch film after film, that deal with the first flush of love, reliving the glory, concentrating on the brightest spot and relegating the life either side into darkness. This is foolish thinking that causes despondency and only allows cynical writers to profit from our indulgence. When Bewildered Heart finds a Harlequin novel entitled Romantics Anonymous and opens the cover to discover it is the story of a support group for those addicted to romance we hope a few insights will be forthcoming. Such as, what is romance, why is it bad for you and why would someone need to wean themselves from it? What’s the treatment and what’s the alternative? Then we learn Cynthia is cured from her addiction to romance with more romance, much like an alcoholic finding a job that intoxication makes easier. But isn’t that like He’s Just Not That Into You, where the female characters realise the Dating Manuel that doubled as their screenplay is a bunch of made-up nonsense that only sometimes applies to life and should probably be ignored, thus rendering the validity of the rhetoric erroneous and the entire film worthless?